@josie Potatoes should be used to feed people, schools should be used to educate people, fire depts should be used to save people, buses should be used to transport people, etc.
Money is a good way of facilitating this, and has been used for these purposes basically for ever.
However, now there has been a reversal of roles, where the potato and the schools and the fire depts and the buses are facilitating the making of money.
So rather than money serving us, via the public institutions, we are now serving the money.
Schools and fire depts and buses should exist to provide a service, not to make a profit.
Why does everything need to make a profit?
The conception that this implies “everybody gotta work for free then, huh?” is idiotic.
Nobody ever did these things for free, but we did once as a society organise them so that people were paid to provide these services (yeah, that’s right, no volunteers, amazing, right?), without the public’s money ever being wasted on filling the pockets of corporate fat cats.
These things are collectively organised and funded by the public, because they are important and beneficial to society as a whole. Are you saying that, if education and transport and emergency services and utilities were provided, at-cost, nationally, we’d all starve? Do you have any examples of this? Because I have a lot of examples where nobody starved and everyone generally agreed that it was pretty fucking good. See: Janka